Talk:Battle of Nicopolis ad Istrum

Bulgaria Low‑importance

	Bulgaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Roman & Byzantine Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Nicopolis ad Istrum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130809172128/http://www.heritage-history.com/www/heritage.php?Dir=wars&FileName=wars_romangerman.php to http://www.heritage-history.com/www/heritage.php?Dir=wars&FileName=wars_romangerman.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicting result of the Battle?

Hello, I've been looking up information about this battle in several different sources and apparently what's written here doesn't make any sense. As mentioned by Jordanes: "The Goths, seeing Decius' armies arrive, withdrew to the Haemus (Balkan) mountains. This doesn't mention any kind of battle in any way, so why is it assumed that Decius' armies caught the Goths off guard and routed them?

Looking for answers I found two completely differring sources: Herwig Wolfram in his book "History of the Goths" claims that Cniva had already sacked the city before Decius arrived to the scene, with Cniva leaving to the Balkan mountains on his own accord before Decius had even made an appearance. On the other hand, the "Encyclopedia of the Roman Empire", written by Charles Bunson, claims what is written here, "Decius surprised the Goths at Nicopolis (c. 249) and inflicted upon them a terrible defeat." Where did any of the two authors get this information from? How is it possible that two very different results are proposed for an engagement that possibly didn't even happen?

Also, the bibliography mentioned in this article is broken. The link to livius.org doesn't work and the second further reading just leads to Marcus Aurelius' war, which is completely unrelated to the topic.

--SRAbian (talk) 11:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]