Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Montlhéry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Battle of Montlhéry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:10, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Result of battle

[edit]

At present, the lead and the article suggest that the battle was indecisive. The infobox has it as a French victory. The infobox should summarise the content of the article, rather than take an alternative position. Does anyone have sources to add to the article that supports the infobox version, or should the infobox be changed to indecisive? Monstrelet (talk) 13:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had noticed this as well, some months back. Unfortunately I hadn't found the time to address this issue. If the article supports inconclusive then that's what should be in the infobox.--Kansas Bear (talk) 14:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the absence of comment to the contrary, I've made a change to indecisive and directed readers to the article text for further explanation. Monstrelet (talk) 16:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]