Talk:Battle of Monocacy

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia.

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Monocacy Junction versus Monocacy

Has there been any discussion about the preferred title of this battle? I grew up minutes away from this site, and have never heard it referred to as "The Battle of Monocacy Junction." It is my understanding that the general rule of thumb in naming battles was to name battles won by the Confederates after geographical features and battles won by Union after place names. I don't even believe the railroad junction was actually named Monocacy Junction. I believe it was known as Frederick Junction. I propose we move the article to "Battle of Monocacy" and make "Battle of Monocacy Junction" the redirect. —Xanderer 13:22, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since the NPS site that we use as a guide says simply Monocacy, I would not object to renaming. Make sure you rename the order of battle articles, too, if others agree. Hal Jespersen 14:39, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Monocacy is by far the more common name (named for the Monocacy River that runs through the battlefield). Monocacy Junction was used in several Union accounts (named for the train depot that was the closest "settlement"), but it rarely appears in Confederate accounts. The NPS uses both terms on their website (the map link is entitled Battle of Monocacy Junction, while the on-line map itself simply says Monocacy). I agree with Hal - make the changes, make a redirect page for the Battle of Monocacy Junction to Battle of Monocacy, etc. Scott Mingus 17:04, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot about this for a while. After trying to do the move just now, it seems an administrator is needed because there already is a Redirect page called Battle of Monocacy. Hal Jespersen 23:00, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Casualties

The infobox and main body of the article disagree: 2359 total vs. 1294 (which includes captured) plus 700-900. Clarityfiend 23:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed and cited consistent numbers. Thanks for catching. Hal Jespersen 00:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changing it to Tactical CSA Victory, Strategic Union Victory

Exactly the same as the title. I'm arguing that it should be, since it had success in its purpose (i.e. to delay the Confederate troops). If you see fault in this, say so and why. Executor Tassadar (talk) 12:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Early's objective was not to capture Washington, but draw troops away from Petersburg and Richmond which was accomplished. Topcat777(talk) 20:32, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Monocacy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Battle of Monocracy" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Battle of Monocracy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 13 § Battle of Monocracy until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:16, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]