Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Mogadishu (March–April 2007)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

It's stupid to even me saying this, so obvious! --HanzoHattori 13:36, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, given that on "On April 1, it was reported that the death toll of the previous four days of heavy fighting in the capital is at least 849 killed civilians, 200 insurgents and 36 Ethiopian soldiers along with the one Ugandan soldier, for a total of 1,086 dead" in a week (which is ALSO unsourced) I find this highly unlikely they then killed "nearly" 800 rebels and some 300 civs in the next four weeks losing only 1 man (or even 1 Eth + 11 TFG, whatever). --HanzoHattori 13:40, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Human rights abuses and crimes

[edit]

The opening paragraph for this section seems a bit misleading. The wording implies that the Ethiopian forces have tried to justify their actions as a response to a violation by the insurgents, but I don't see anywhere in the referenced article where the Ethiopian forces have made any such claim. The cited article is simply stating that two wrongs don't make a right, and uses a scenario from their list of described violations to illustrate the point. While the Ethiopian forces did bombard those areas, and most likely did do it in response to the insurgents deploying there, I haven't seen anything that says they are using that as a justifications. I'd suggest rewriting the paragraph:

All parties involved in the conflict have violated the laws of war. It should be noted, however, that a violation by one side does not justify a violation by the other. E.g. insurgent forces unlawfully deploying in densely populated neighborhoods would not justify Ethiopian forces bombarding those areas indiscriminately.

Does anyone disagree? Undisputedloser 23:45, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

then how do you want it rewritten? --TheFEARgod (Ч) 12:18, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Something similar to this:

All parties involved in the conflict have violated the laws of war. It should be noted, however, that a violation by one side does not justify a violation by the other. E.g. insurgent forces unlawfully deploying in densely populated neighborhoods would not justify Ethiopian forces bombarding those areas indiscriminately.

Alternatively, if someone can locate anything showing the Ethiopian forces did make such a statement, we could simply add that as a second reference in the paragraph. Undisputedloser 16:10, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
go ahead --TheFEARgod (Ч) 16:28, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mogadishu march 2007.jpg

[edit]

Image:Mogadishu march 2007.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. MkativerataCCI (talk) 20:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Battle of Mogadishu (March–April 2007). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:40, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Mogadishu (March–April 2007). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:39, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Battle of Mogadishu (March–April 2007). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Battle_of_Mogadishu_(March–April_2007)&oldid=1206175881"