Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Mogadishu (2010–11)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Attacked" implies a conventional force

[edit]

When saying they attacked Kampala, at least in the context of the article, it makes me think of an attack with guns and mortars, we should probably note it was a suicide bomb attack rather than anything conventional. 72.222.247.148 (talk) 16:59, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal discussion

[edit]

Discussion of merge proposal can be found here Talk:August_2010_Mogadishu_attacks#Merger_proposalOut of Phase User (talk) 19:28, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

‎ This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Nick-D (talk) 08:20, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't you have just reworded the stuff for the 25th? It's kind of a loss of info this way. SilverserenC 14:30, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please help by doing that? I'm not at all familiar with the topic of the article. Nick-D (talk) 03:56, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute in facts-- numbers of deaths

[edit]

So the number of people killed in this battle was just changed from 140 to '70+' based on a source change from: http://afriqueactu.net/6034/afrique/somalie/violences-en-somalie-plus-de-140-morts to http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/sep/03/6-somali-civilians-killed-in-violence-in-mogadishu/ Which of these is the notable and correct source, do we think? Is this reduction in numbers POV? Should it just be considered more accurate? Was the change valid? Thurinym (talk) 16:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are so many sources out there saying conflicting total number of number of deaths it is hard to tell what is confirmed and what is not. By changing the reference I just found one that was more up to date is all and the reference does state that the number is confirmed by the head of Mogadishu's voluntary ambulance service. Also the source looks to be from The Associated Press. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:18, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where did the Foreign Mujahedeen come from?

[edit]

The Battle of Mogadishu (2010) began on August 23, 2010 when al-Shabaab insurgents began attacking government and African Union Mission to Somalia

I do not see any mention or reference for Mogadishu in the article about The Foreign Mujahedeen being involved in this battle. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:38, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In a press release from AMISOM on February 20th 2011, they claim to have killed several foreign Al-Shabaab fighters from Yemen, Pakistan, Kenya, Syria and India: http://www.garoweonline.com/artman2/publish/Press_Releases_32/AMISOM_Smashes_Extremist_s_Urban_Trench_System.shtml Hamza-nor (talk) 13:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Situation map of Mogadishu August 6 2011.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Situation map of Mogadishu August 6 2011.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:19, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Situation map of Mogadishu March 2011.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Situation map of Mogadishu March 2011.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:58, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Situation map of Mogadishu (Bakaara market) May 2011.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Situation map of Mogadishu (Bakaara market) May 2011.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:58, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More troops?

[edit]

First of July 2011 it was reported that 3,000 additional troops had arrived in Mogadishu.http://somaliareport.com/index.php/post/1071/3000_African_Union_Troops_Arrive_in_Mogadishu_ and http://shabelle.net/article.php?id=8216

And before it was around 9,000 AMISOM troops, but still it is 9,000 troops in Mogadishu and they are waiting for the next 3,000. Did I miss something? Hamza-nor (talk) 12:11, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT?

[edit]

It didn't even end yet.[1][2] Also lots and LOTS other false information (including the claim of the ICU is an umbrella group of the insurgents today!) and original research (like the editors' appearant own attempts to compute the number of casualties, for example). The article as it stands now is just (possibly accidental) disinformation and it's really badly written too. --194.145.185.229 (talk) 12:04, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is very difficult to get exact numbers on causalities and killed. The numbers are usually different from each source. Maybe you would help to rewrite the article so it is easier to read and understand? Hamza-nor (talk) 12:27, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Battle of Mogadishu (2010–11). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:12, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 18 external links on Battle of Mogadishu (2010–11). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Battle of Mogadishu (2010–11). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Mogadishu (2010–11). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:04, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Mogadishu (2010–11). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Battle_of_Mogadishu_(2010–11)&oldid=1175132319"