Talk:Battle of Megiddo (609 BC)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Megiddo (609 BC) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ancient Egypt

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

Assyria High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

unsigned

Isn't it a bit disrespectful that a cross symbol is used to denote the death of a Jewish king?

It's a dagger, not a cross. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 21:22, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aftermath section

Just to note that some of this has been copied with no edit summary attributing it to the original article (and thus the editor(s) whose work it is) at Jehoahaz of Judah. Technically this is copyvio.--Doug Weller (talk) 14:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Egyptzo's edits

I find I can no longer assume good faith with this editor. He has been found to have committed a number of copyright violations (copyvios) and was temporarily blocked for these. Most were quite flagrant from other websites, and I would be surprised if all have been found. Some are all too common on Wikipedia, such as the one I mentioned above which was his and his copy and paste of material from Armageddon in the discussion in this article on the topography of the battle. These would not be copyvios is he had provided a link in the edit summaries to the articles he took them from (and he needs to follow Wikipedia guidelines and use edit summaries more). The bit around the text "proceeding through the low tracts of Philistia and Sharon, prepared to cross the ridge of hills" has been plagiarised from an 1886 article by Professor George Rawlinson at [1]. This not only brings Wikipedia into disrepute, but it makes for bad, unreliable articles when editors use uncited stuff from other articles or plagiarise 19th century publications. I'm removing most of his edits. --Doug Weller (talk) 09:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Having said the above, he has worked hard on Wikipedia and started a number of articles. If he could learn to keep his personal opinions out of articles, always give citations and use edit summaries,and never copy from anything else, I would probably be praising him instead of criticising him and he could be a very valuable editor. --Doug Weller (talk) 10:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talmud and Jewish Works as Source to Information About the Battle

Would this (namely, the Talmud and other later Jewish Sources) be acceptable for use in information for how the battle possibly played out? I mean, in the article about the battle, how it occured, troop numbers, equipment, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paceinator (talk • contribs) 20:24, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

picture

Picture or map needed 2600:1011:B30E:8F2F:D979:BEA1:3ACC:9316 (talk) 05:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]