Talk:Battle of Maudach

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Maudach article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

France High‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: European / French / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

CE

Did a cheeky little CE, tidied prose, awkward translations (?) - to – hyphenated isbns; rv as desired.Keith-264 (talk) 17:25, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

B-Class criterion 1

Auntieruth55; I have upped the article to C-class rather than leaving it in limbo. There was a citation needed tag placed, by me, on the end of a paragraph in the article. AustralianRupert has tentatively removed that CN tag and replaced it with the most plausible reference. When somebody gets the chance to verify the following passage and citation, upgrade to B-class;

Louis Desaix, commanding the left (northern) column of the Army of the Rhine and Moselle, had about 27,000 infantry and 3,000 cavalry when he crossed the Rhine at Maudach. He faced Petrasch's division of about a third of the size, including mixed troops of infantry and dragoons.<ref name=Dodge286/>

Cheers, Mr rnddude (talk) 05:07, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

yes this is correct. auntieruth (talk) 15:15, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, glad that's sorted. My apologies for my role in the delay in getting it to B-class. Normally I post B-class reviews on the article talk page, but, as I only had the concern with the citation style and one citation I didn't think it was necessary to put it here. I have, however, learned my lesson about that. Mr rnddude (talk) 15:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]