This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Maskin article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
@Al Ameer son:Thanks for addressing the points. A few more follow:
Muhallab did not refuse to go to Maskin. He had been fighting Azriqa for several months continuously when he received the news of Abd al-Malik's advance on Iraq.
Wasn't Jufriya revolt in 690? Both Wellhausen and Dixon mention various sources that give year 689, but they themselves both mention it have occurred in second campaign in 690.
As often with the chronology of the period, there is apparent confusion in the sources. Dixon notes that Abu Mikhnaf, al-Mada'ini, both generally considered reliable, and al-Mubarrad and apparently Wahb ibn Jarir as well say 689. Abu Mikhnaf (and/or al-Waqidi) says it coincided with the attempted coup of al-Ashdaq in Damascus, which was in 689. From my reading, Dixon isn't necessarily indicating that the Jufriyya revolt happened during the second campaign, while Wellhausen, using one account recorded in al-Tabari, does before going on to say, according to another account in al-Tabari, that the Jufriyya revolt had already occurred in the year prior. I'd stick with 689, but I can add "or 690" to cover our bases. What do you suggest? --Al Ameer (talk) 18:21, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thats the issue. But no big deal. Its upto you. I would have preferred mentioning that it may well have happened in 690.
Please remove these 3 "according to"s, none of them is necessary: Tabari quotes Mus'ab words, so it is not according to Tabari. Ibrahim's death deciding Mus'ab's death is plain fact; citation is enough. "ordered his poets to commemorate his heroic end" is also a report that Lammens presents. AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯)16:39, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pass. Nice work. Good to see another Second Fitna battle as GA. Maybe we can get to Good Topic with some effort ;) BTW, do you have Dixon Book pdf?AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯)18:43, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review AhmadLX. And yes, I’m all for working towards a Good topic ;) I don’t have the book, just the thesis. I use the latter and find the corresponding page number in the google books version. —Al Ameer (talk) 22:30, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I also do the same with Dixon ;) Al Ameer son: then Harrah and Harura are yours ;) I will look into Ayn al-Warda and 2nd Mecca. 1st Mecca's main contributor is Cplakidas, don't know if he is interested in this. But it is in good shape and can easily pass GAN with a little work. That will leave only Karbala, which can be done at the end. What do you say? AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯)18:58, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
