Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Lalakaon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleBattle of Lalakaon is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Did You KnowOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 8, 2009Good article nomineeListed
January 19, 2013WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
June 10, 2018Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
June 20, 2022Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 23, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in the Battle of Lalakaon in 863 AD, three Byzantine armies, marching from different directions, converged on time to surround an Arab army?
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 3, 2011, September 3, 2013, September 3, 2016, September 3, 2018, and September 3, 2022.
Current status: Featured article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Lalakaon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review of this version:
Pn = paragraph n • Sn = sentence n

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • The lead section should be a summary of the contents of the article: The last part of the final sentence—regarding the 10th century—seems not to be covered in the article at all. Also, the current single paragraph might better be split into two paragraphs, perhaps before the sentence beginning The battle ended in a….
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • "The battle", P1, S3: Does the Kiapidou work cover the assertion of a bias against Michael? If that source does not cover that, it needs to be cited.
    • Same section, P2, S6: the speculation about Karbeas should be cited.
    • None of the works in the "Sources" section contain a place of publication, and two—Huxley and Kiapidou—don't have a publisher listed.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    On hold for seven days. — Bellhalla (talk) 04:24, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a few minor issues keep this from passing on first read. Should be easily remedied within seven days. — Bellhalla (talk) 04:24, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! On the citations, Kiapidou mentions the bias against Michael. The possible participation of Karbeas is also covered by her. On sources, I added additional data on Huxley. Kiapidou's publisher is the Encyclopedia of the Hellenic World website. On locations, it is the first time anyone has asked for them. I added some of them, however. I also expanded the lead a bit. As for the last sentence of the lead, it is intended as a generalization to cap it off. The battle is seen by some historians as marking a turning point, after which Byzantium was able to counter the threat from the Arabs in the East, but it would be too much off topic to go into it in any detail in the article. Any more observations? Constantine ✍ 11:20, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, the changes look good, so I'm passing it. Not having full location or publisher information doesn't keep this from passing; I usually indicate items like that they they are optional and will help with higher assessments (like A-Class or FA-Class) but forgot to include that in this case. — Bellhalla (talk) 22:57, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All right! Thanks a lot again! Cheers, Constantine ✍ 23:58, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Battle of Lalakaon. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Battle of Lalakaon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:12, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This is indeed a great article. Beickus (talk) 01:20, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Battle_of_Lalakaon&oldid=1206172740"