Talk:Battle of Lade/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written:
- Not Yet
- Longdashes should not have any spaces between them. Any normal dashes (-) in the text should be replaced with longdashes (—).
- Done
- There are a number of typos and other grammatical errors thoughout the prose. I recommend it recieve a copy-edit, preferably by a third party (but you could do this yourself as well).
- Ah, yes. Whoops. I've gone through and removed everything I could find (including my shocking inability to type "contingent" properly).
- It is factually accurate and verifiable:
- Not Yet
- "Herodotus gives the order of the Ionian battle line as being, from east to west; Miletus – Priene – Myus – Teos – Chios – Erythraea – Phocaea – Lesbos – Samos." -needs a ref.
- Done
- The big quote in the "Prelude" section ""Men of Ionia, let each one of you now show..." needs a ref.
- Done##Per WP:FOOT, the refs should be in the form of "Name, p. #" Some of them are in this format, but not all of them.
- Done
- All of the refs need to be put into {{cite book}} format.
- Done
- It is broad in its coverage:
- Pass No problems there.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy:
- Pass
- It is stable:
- Pass No problems there.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
- Pass No problems there.
- Overall:
- On Hold while a few stylistic issues are addressed. -Ed!(talk) 03:50, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- OK. The article now meets the GA criteria, according to my interpretation of them. Well done! Ed!(talk) 13:19, 8 July 2009 (UTC)