Talk:Battle of La Guaira

Venezuela Low‑importance

	Venezuela portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Venezuela, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Venezuela on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VenezuelaWikipedia:WikiProject VenezuelaTemplate:WikiProject VenezuelaVenezuela articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / British / European / Spanish

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Spanish military history task force

Assessment

I've assessed this against the five B class criteria and believe it to be a Start-class article. Please note that the Military history project currently does not use C-class. For a successful B-class rating the article requires some more in-line citations (at least one per paragraph, more if multiple sources are used or multiple challengable assertions are made, numbers quoted etc.) Also, I believe that the article falls down on grammar. I've copy-edited most of the typos, etc, however, the tense used in the article does not seem right to me. For example use of words such as "is" should be replaced with "was" as these events occured in the past. A final suggestion is to add a bit more context to the article as it is a bit difficult for a reader without knowledge of the era to determine why the battle occured. When you feel like the article is ready for re-assessment, please add it to the list at WP:MHA. If you would like more in depth comments, you might consider adding it for peer review by going to WP:MHPR. Thank you for your contribution and good work so far. — AustralianRupert (talk) 07:01, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Casualties

Does anyone have an idea about exactly how many British ships were damaged, captured or sunk. This information is needed for the battle box. --Az81964444 (talk) 21:15, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of La Guaira. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722002031/http://www.royal-navy.org/lib/index.php?title=C1701_-_1750 to http://www.royal-navy.org/lib/index.php?title=C1701_-_1750

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:07, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]