Talk:Battle of Ismailia/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 18:28, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- The article is well referenced.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- The article covers the major events of the battle and is focused.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- The article follows a neutral point of view.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- The article does not appear to be affected by any edit warring.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images are used well and freely licensed through public domain ruling.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- A very interesting read, and now a Good Article too. Harrison49 (talk) 19:56, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: