This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article was very poorly written and I'm not totally convinced that all my edits are kosher. What makes me say this is that re-reading the article a few times throws up some interesting points, eg '19th Philipine Battalion Combat Team' and '179th United States Infantry {both red links) and in the last (June 1952) section, the article has a battalion being relieved by a division ! I'm no tactical expert, but that sounds incredibly generous. RASAM (talk) 13:48, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
