Talk:Battle of Hieton
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Anglo-Scottish war (1650–1652) was copied or moved into Battle of Hieton with this edit on 00:04, 20 February 2022. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle of Hieton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061015143243/http://www.geo.ed.ac.uk:81/scotgaz/features/featurefirst9971.html to http://www.geo.ed.ac.uk:81/scotgaz/features/featurefirst9971.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:03, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
B class review
[edit]B class. However, please check whether you agree with my correction. See below. Djmaschek (talk) 04:09, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- ORIGINAL: the more dogmatic thought God had deserted them because the the army had not been sufficiently purged of godliness, and argued that too much faith had been put in a worldly prince who was not sufficiently committed to the cause of the Covenant.
- CORRECTED: the more dogmatic thought God had deserted them because the army had not been sufficiently purged of godlessness, and argued that too much faith had been put in a worldly prince who was not sufficiently committed to the cause of the Covenant. (Removed extra "the" and changed "godliness" to "godlessness". After all, only an atheist army would purge soldiers for godliness.)
- @Djmaschek: Completely correct. That was a very last minute change, and clearly I didn't proofread it closely enough. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:51, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- B-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- B-Class Early Modern warfare articles
- Early Modern warfare task force articles
- B-Class Wars of the Three Kingdoms articles
- Wars of the Three Kingdoms task force articles
- B-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles