| Rate
|
Attribute
|
Review Comment
|
| 1. Well-written:
|
|
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
|
- North in the lead should be north
 Y
- mediatised? Plain English needed here, at a minimum it should be linked.Y
- link French DirectoryY, Old Swiss ConfederacyY, plus some explanation of what they were.
- Kray's army was still guarded the passes? ie should be "guarding"Y I've fixed this
- a fair amount of overlinking, Lake ConstanceY, NapoleonY, MoreauY, KrayY, LecourbeY, StockachY, TyrolY, FZMY, WürttembergY, Electorate of BavariaY, German mediatizationY, BlindheimY, DonauwörthY
- In Dispositions section, some linking needed, eg Tapfheim etcY
|
|
|
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
|
- the lead has two citations in it for information that does not appear to be at all controversial. These facts should be covered in the body of the article and cited there, rather than in the lead.Y
- half of the lead relates not to this battle, but its predecessor 100 years earlier. Needs to be a proper summary of this battle.Y
|
| 2. Verifiable with no original research:
|
|
|
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
|
|
|
|
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
|
- what is the reliability of napoleon-series.org?Y
- very reliable. Standard "go to" for documents re the napoleon era.
- Who is Arnold in the citations? No reference listed.Y
- Is Digby Smith the same as Smith?Y
- I am unsure about the extensive use of Moreau, as it appears to be a primary sourceY
- Used as a source in a secondary source. Citation clarified.
|
|
|
2c. it contains no original research.
|
|
| 3. Broad in its coverage:
|
|
|
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
|
|
|
|
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
|
|
|
|
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
|
|
|
|
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
|
|
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
|
|
|
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
|
- File:Votivbild Schlacht bei Meßkirch mit Rahmen.jpg doesn't have an appropriate licence, it appears to be about the photograph of the painting, not the painting itself. I suspect the appropriate PD licence might be PD-Art, but I suggest you check with Nikkimaria.
- Have pinged Nikkimaria, but not heard back from her yet.
- I see Nikkimaria has recommended PD-US/PD-US-1923-abroad for this one. If it was changed to that, it would be fine.Y this image has been removed
- File:Jean-Victor Moreau.jpg doesn't look right either, unless assumptions are being made about the life span of the author. Currently there is noting in the licence to indicate anything about the assumed life span of the author.
- This is the standard image of Moreau used throughout wikipedia, and on most books about him.
- I don't doubt it, but to use it in a GA we need to know what the copyright situation is, the source link is dead. As Nikki says, we need to know when it was created and/or who the author was.Y this image has been replaced with one that is clearly PD (known author, known date of death over 100 years ago)
- Licensing of File:Pal Kray.jpg is also dubious. Where is the evidence that Jens-Florian Ebert released it into the public domain?
- same as image of Moreau.Y (this image has been removed and replaced with one that is PD).
|
|
|
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
|
- Is File:Pal Kray.jpg an image of Kray or Archduke John?Y
- duh. Good catch. I've added image of Archduke John.
|
|
|
7. Overall assessment.
|
On hold for seven days for the above comments to be addressed Listing as GA, well done. Regards, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 01:21, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
|
