Talk:Battle of El Tor

Military history: European / Ottoman / Spanish / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Ottoman military history task force
	Spanish military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Portugal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Egypt

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Former countries: Ottoman Empire

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ottoman Empire.

Result

Hello Wareno, I find it strange that your revert states “Adding content that does not match citations, completely WP:DISRUPTIVE.” yet you replaced it with an unsourced “Portuguese victory” statement that does not match any citations, seems quite odd. Moreover, to state that the content did not match the statements is shocking, but unsurprising to say the least.

Translated from Portuguese: “How the Gouernador Dom Effenao da Gama destroyed the city of Alcocer, & finally embarked on Tor. And how he failed to destroy that city at the behest of the friars of Janeta Caterina of Monte Synai”^[1]

The "banks of Tor" are the shores of the Red Sea, to which Estêvão led an expedition in 1541. It did not succeed but that side of it goes unremarked in The Lusiad and Estêvão may be thought of as having chastised his share of Moors.”^[2]

So please enlighten me on how these citations do not support the “Portuguese failure” statement and also enlighten me on how the “Portuguese victory” statement which you seem to be very persistent on is supported and by which citations. Kabz15 (talk) Kabz15 (talk) 21:42, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's my pleasure to enlighten you; it's not as "strange" and "odd" as persistently adding content which does not match the primary sources you use, and whose language you don't understand. "Deixou de" means "did not", not "failed". As in, did not destroy the city he captured after routing its defenders. Please cease your disruptive editing. Wareno (talk) 22:02, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Couto, Diogo do. Asia. Dos feitos que os Portugueses fizeram na conquista e descobrimento das terras e mares do Oriente. Portugal: Pedro Crasbeeck, 1612.
^ Studien zur Germanistik, Anglistik und Komparatistik. Germany: Bouvier, 1989.

[1] Couto, Diogo do. Asia. Dos feitos que os Portugueses fizeram na conquista e descobrimento das terras e mares do Oriente. Portugal: Pedro Crasbeeck, 1612.

[2] Studien zur Germanistik, Anglistik und Komparatistik. Germany: Bouvier, 1989.

[1]

[2]