Talk:Battle of Dumpu

Battle of Dumpu has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 26, 2022. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Dumpu article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Australia: Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal Battle of Dumpu is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 23:52, November 22, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Military history: Asian / South Pacific / Japanese / North America / Southeast Asia / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	North American military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Melanesia: Papua New Guinea Low‑importance

	Oceania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Melanesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Melanesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MelanesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MelanesiaTemplate:WikiProject MelanesiaMelanesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Papua New Guinea (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Military history Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.

A fact from Battle of Dumpu appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 February 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in the Battle of Dumpu, Lieutenant Colonel Ralph Honner, although covered in blood and black ants, refused to be carried from the field for fear it might endanger the stretcher bearers?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Dumpu.

Wikipedia

phrasing in Aftermath section

Nice article. The phrase "as a logistical" needs something more to be grammatical, within full sentence "An airstrip was developed at Dumpu, which would assume great importance as a logistical in the subsequent fighting in the Finisterres." I tried using revision history search to isolate the diff, but it seems I don't know how to use it. Hope this helps. --do ncr am 02:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have fixed the wording. Hawkeye7 (talk) 05:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Dumpu/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 03:30, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a look at this one. Zawed (talk) 03:30, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Perhaps add a couple of sentences following "the 7th Division advanced from Kaiapit to Dumpu in the Ramu Valley." to describe the nature of the advance and opposition.
Y Added. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Background

The link on Lae isn't on its first usage.
Y Linked. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Between the Ramu Valley...: the link on Ramu Valley is actually to the river, which is mentioned earlier.
Y Unlinked. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Some of the dates in the Military Situation section recite the year (1943) when that has already been established and it is clear from the context that it hasn't progressed to 1944.
Y Removed. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
...belonging to 78th Infantry Regiment, along with one company of the 80th Infantry Regiment.: perhaps clarify that these regiments are part of the 20th Division. That introduces the division and places it in better context when it is mentioned in the next paragraph.
Y Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle

the heavily equipped diggers: just wondering whether diggers is a little colloquial here?
Y I don't think so. Linked. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
and ANGAU hired local labour: maybe provide a little context for what ANGAU is here?
Y Added a footnote about ANGAU. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
moved to Kaigulan II: what is moved to Kaigulan II? Sounds like a military base?
Y Not really. Changed "II" to "2" and added an explanatory footnote. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Private W. H. G. remained to protect Honner: missing a surname for the private? It may not be important but the private isn't mentioned again and the reader gets the impression later that Honner had been abandoned.
Y Private W. H. G. Bennett QX27023. Not sure how his name got deleted. Added a bit more. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Other stuff

Dupe links: Lae, Papuan Infantry Battalion
Y Unlinked. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Image tags OK.

This looks to be in good order with only minor issues. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:13, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All points addressed. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hawkeye, this looks all good. I believe that the article meets the necessary criteria so am passing as GA. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 09:29, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]