Talk:Battle of Cobleskill/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 21:54, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this! MathewTownsend (talk) 21:54, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice article. Just one question:

When you say "New York authorities", who do you mean?

Governor Clinton appeared to be the prime mover in successfully getting authorization to use Continental forces (this is mentioned in the body). I've reworded the bit in the lead. Magic♪piano 14:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I made a few edits which you are free to change.[1]

MathewTownsend (talk) 22:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits look fine. Thanks for reviewing! Magic♪piano 14:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:

B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Provides references to all sources:

B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Main aspects are addressed:

B. Remains focused:
Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Congratulations! Very nice. MathewTownsend (talk) 22:30, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]