This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Although I don't know much about this battle, I'm not so sure this should be classified a tactical French victory, considering Napoleon retreated. Guard Chasseur (talk) 09:06, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The following mistakenly cited sentence is removed. "On one occasion the Emperor, protected only by a single company of the Polish 1st Light Cavalry Regiment of the Imperial Guard barely avoided being taken prisoner." This passage is not at Chandler 1966, p.997, as cited. I own a copy of this book and I've checked. However, the howitzer shell incident is found in Chandler and it will be incorporated into the article instead. Djmaschek (talk) 23:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
One user tried to change the result to Indecisive or Inconclusive, claiming that this information came from David G. Chandler's Campaigns of Napoleon. In fact, I checked this and Chandler made no such statement either there or in Dictionary of the Napoleonic Wars. Another editor (not me) reverted the edit so that result remains Coalition victory. Djmaschek (talk) 02:13, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
