Talk:Battle of Tughlaqabad

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Tughlaqabad article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / South Asia / Early Modern C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

History

Many of the statements have no historical basis. Please prove the statements using valid peer reviewed academic publications. Can anyone demonstrate that there was a capital in Delhi some 300 years ago? The Indus Valley civilization itself is around 2500 BC and are there any similar ruins in Delhi? Till they are found, maybe we should stick to scientific and archaeological facts — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.12.162.123 (talk) 21:00, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

i assumed this page was implicitly contained with biased Hindu-Nationalism propaganda by using Hemu as figure head of hegemony, though some elements were still worth to keep as information Ahendra (talk) 10:16, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]