Talk:Batman & Robin (film)/GA1

GA Review

Lead

• I'm a bit confused by the lead. Although I know that the film is part of a series, it doesn't say as such until the second sentence, after it has says "Chris O'Donnell returning" and "introducing Batgirl".

Plot

• I'd suggest wikilinking Gotham.
• Bat-Signal and Bat-signal. Which is correct? Also no need to link twice.

Cast

• "However, Batman is facing an argument with Robin feeling he can take on villains without him." There should be a comma between Robin and feeling. However it might need rewording anyway. Who feels he can take on villains alone? Batman or Robin?
• Is MacGregor's Syndrome a fictional disease?

Development

• Are the links to February 1996 and March 1996 necessary?
• There's several use of brackets. I'm not a big fan of brackets, if the text is vital then I feel it's better without brackets.

Box office

• "In contrast, The Lost World grossed over $600 million globally." Do you have a reference for this?

Legacy

• What happened to Clooney's three-film contract?

References

• The first link isn't formatted correctly?
• Should it been done in two columns rather than three?

General

• There seems to be a lot of repeated wikilinks.
• Are there any more appropriate images?

A bit to do, so I'll put it on hold for now. Peanut4 (talk) 23:44, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

All done. There aren't any appropriate images, beyond perhaps free photos of the actors, but they aren't really appropriate for this film article. Gary King (talk) 03:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

The plot says McGregor's Syndrome, the cast says MacGregor's Syndrome. Which is correct? Secondly is this a real or fictional disease? Everything else looks alright. If there any images which might be in the slightest bit appropriate, it might be worth considering adding them because it's a lot of text to work through. Peanut4 (talk) 10:59, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

The latter spelling is correct; the former has been fixed. It is a fictional disease. I've added an image of Clooney as he plays an important role in this film, and I have added the image to the paragraph that discusses when he was hired. Gary King (talk) 16:27, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

All looks good now. I've added a note to clarify the disease is a fictional one, in the cast section. Obviously it would be nice to find some more appropriate images. But all round, good work. Peanut4 (talk) 16:45, 28 July 2008 (UTC)