Talk:Bath Blitz

Military history: Aviation / British / European / German / World War II B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge tag

This article acquired a merge tag last month; I've deleted it, as there was no discussion set up, nor any rationale given, and the tagging is all to pot.
If the comment provided (as a red link) “The vast majority of this content is covered in the Baedeker Blitz article, and what little is different can easily be merged” is the justification for this merge proposal, then it fails the WP:MERGE criterion; if there is currently a “large degree of overlap” it is nothing that cannot be remedied; and it is also the case that:_

The separate topics could be expanded into longer standalone (but cross-linked) articles
The topics are discrete subjects warranting their own articles, even though they might be short.

The Baedeker Blitz article is a general article, and describes, in summary, about half a dozen different events, as well as giving some background; this article should describe, in detail, one of those events in the context of a particular place. And if it true (as the article currently claims) the Bath Blitz was triggered by the bombing of Lubeck, then the Bath air raids, which actually caused a similar amount of damage and a comparable number of casualties, are just as notable as that event, which has a comprehensive article all to itself.
I've trimmed this article of some of the extraneous stuff; if anyone feels a merge is still a good idea, I suggest they read WP:MERGE and set up a proper proposal. Xyl 54 (talk) 17:12, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bath Blitz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.royalcrescentbath.com/HistoryRoyalCrescent%202.htm
Added archive https://archive.is/20080131165322/http://www.royalcrescentbath.com/HistoryRoyalCrescent%202.htm to http://www.royalcrescentbath.com/HistoryRoyalCrescent%202.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:17, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]