Talk:Bastille Day solar storm
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Too Technical
[edit]"Active region 9077 produced an X5-class flare, which caused an S3 radiation storm"
What the hell does that mean? (74.177.44.64 (talk) 07:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC))
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bastille Day event. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090814051854/http://ulysses.jpl.nasa.gov/science/monthly_highlights/2000-July-new_manu5_jgr.pdf to http://ulysses.jpl.nasa.gov/science/monthly_highlights/2000-July-new_manu5_jgr.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:09, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 26 November 2021
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to Bastille Day solar storm. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:38, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Bastille Day event → ? – Clearly not the primary topic when compared to the flipping storming of the Bastille; unsure what a better title would be. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 23:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support 'Bastille Day Flare' and 'Bastille Day solar storm' appear in citations 'Bastille Day event' does not—blindlynx 00:31, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support "Bastille Day event" is really vague. I think "Bastille Day solar storm" would be the most appropriate. CoronalMassAffection (talk) 03:35, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Current title fails to be sufficiently precise in describing what the subject is (a solar storm). — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 23:27, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
- Bastille Day event coronal mass ejection and particle storm from SOHO's LASCO C2 coronagraph.gif (discussion)
- Bastille Day event solar flare and particle storm from SOHO's EIT 195Å.gif (discussion)
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:07, 22 April 2022 (UTC)