Talk:Basis Technology

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Wikify and Advert notice removal

I have added some internal links, added an External Links section and added inline refs to the text, also edits to text to make it less 'advert like'. I have therefore removed the advert|article and Wikify|date=March 2007 notices, but will add a stub notice, since the article clearly needs expanding or rewriting but I'll leave that to others that might know more about the company background etc.Ray3055 (talk) 22:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-- Thanks Ray3055. I think it may have been reverted to an advert. Phrases like "Rosette enhances any application that depends on extracting meaningful intelligence from huge volumes of unstructured text - accurately, quickly and cost effectively." are far from NPOV! I will do a quick clean up. --winterstein (talk) 13:24, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

-- The recent edits by User:Pw5001 look a bit like commercially motivated content. Hello @Pw5001 -- Do you have a connection with this company? --winterstein (talk) 21:49, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]