Talk:Basic and Applied Social Psychology

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Academic Journals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Untitled

Hi, re recent deletion of analysis of effect of not using p-values. Wikipedia requires references to be verifiable and relevant, not that they be peer reviewed. This blog entry is by an expert witness, open to scrutiny, as as relevant as other sources. Blogs of this nature are accepted along with newspapers etc. If there is a competing analysis, please cite it as well. Tim bates (talk) 20:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blog

Hello,

The problem is there was no "analysis." There are a couple examples of cherry-picked articles, and an opinion based on them. There was no empirical evidence or other evidence based on data (e.g., a comparison between years before and after the ban) to back up the claim that BASP has "banned error control." So again, please don't refer to an "analysis of effect of not using p-values" when there was no such "analysis" performed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louie Montero (talk • contribs) 16:56, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]