Talk:Baseball (TV series)

Baseball Mid‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Documentary / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Untitled

Needs something about criticisms, especially from Olbermann and other baseball researchers. Westfall 05:06, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We had a very well written section pointing out the liberal bias, also the fact that it focused almost exclusively on New York, Boston, race relations, and the reserve clause, ignoring other aspects of baseball, but the Wikipedia censors removed it.John Paul Parks (talk) 15:07, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Baseballburns.jpg

Image:Baseballburns.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing statement

The 10th Inning section begins with "At a preview screening of his 2007 documentary The War, Ken Burns spoke of very possibly coming up to date in the history of baseball with a "10th Inning" episode of his Baseball documentary, and it can be found on the Florentine Films web site." Besides being a poorly written run-on sentence, the reference for this sentence is a hyperlink to an interview with Ken Burns rather than the Florentine Films web site. Just wondering what the best way to clean this up would be. Wickedjacob (talk) 11:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The blog interview should be moved to external links, since the new episode is not discussed there (unless I'm missing something). After the "it can found" then a cite to the link to the florentine films website where you can "find it", if it exists. Also, the "probable" topics paragraph should be removed as that is original research. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 15:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Baseball (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070831232559/http://blogs.trb.com:80/news/local/morningnews/blog/2007/08/10th_inning_with_ken_burns.html to http://blogs.trb.com/news/local/morningnews/blog/2007/08/10th_inning_with_ken_burns.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]