Talk:Bart vs. Thanksgiving/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
"At the risk of losing my voice, let me just say one more thing: I'm sorry I came."
— Jacqueline Bouvier
The article does not have serious issues that would warrant a quick-fail. Full review to be commenced shortly, likely tomorrow or Saturday. decltype (talk) 20:35, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
- The prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct.
- b (MoS):
- Looks good.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
- b (citations to reliable sources):
- c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its scope.
- a (major aspects):
- b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
As usual, this article seems to equal the standard of other TV Episode GAs. Here are some minor issues:
"Jay Kogen and Wallace Wolodarsky are the names of two Dallas Cowboys players, a reference to two writers on The Simpsons." This was a bit confusing to me, I had to look up whether they where players or writers. How about "Two of the fictional DC players, JK and WW, are named after [two] writers ...", or something like that.
- Done.
The Lisa quote about her centerpiece uses ellipses, but where text really omitted from it, or are they used to illustrate slight pauses?
- Pauses.
- I changed it into regular punctuation.
IIRC Maggie speaks in the dream sequence. "It's your fault I can't talk" or similar (voiced by Yeardley I presume). Is it worth a mention?
- It might, but I can't find a reliable source for it.
- Ah, too bad.
Are you sure the ISBN number is correct?
- Fixed.
I have watchlisted the article and the review and will respond to improvements as fast as I can. decltype (talk) 07:11, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! TheLeftorium 07:59, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Everything seems to check out now. I did a small ce and tweaked the FUR a little. The plot summary made me remember the entire episode, so I think it's pretty good. Still, I'd like to rewatch the episode before passing it. But I have no more issues, and I definitely think it is GA standard. Good work! (som vanligt) decltype (talk) 09:43, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, everything checks out. The plot section is succint, but is an excellent summary of the episode. GA passed. decltype (talk) 21:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. :) TheLeftorium 21:14, 12 June 2009 (UTC)