Talk:BartPE

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Microsoft Windows: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Offline

Site is now down and product no longer available, so maybe it doesn't matter much anymore...? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.128.192.31 (talk) 22:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC) Removed external support links, which are now either gone, or infected with Malware:[reply]

911cd.net/forums/ international BART PE forum
teutonpe.de/ TeutonPE website dedicated to the customization of BartPE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Digdog9 (talk • contribs) 03:03, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Free software?

The classification of the PE Builder as free software is disputable. Clauses 6 and 7 of the PE Builder License restrict commercial redistribution and the incorporation of the PE Builder into other projects, respectively. Also, nowhere in the license is modification permitted. Although Nu2 claims that the PE Builder is free software, it appears to more accurately fall under the category of either freeware or unmodifiable freely redistributable software.

In any case, I've changed the words "free software" in the BartPE article to "freeware" to more accurately reflect the terms under which the PE Builder is licensed.

--141.152.218.252 23:36, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The additions of 2005-11-18 reverted

Ok, I'm going to slash everything added today for the following reasons:

Most of it is POV and/or unencyclopedic. ("Very handy for...", "very suitable for...")
The screenshot is non-informative.
Some information is duplicated. ("Bart's PE Builder helps you build a "BartPE"..." duplicates "A user can create his own installation of BartPE using the installation disk of the operating system in question and the program PE Builder")

The change looks likes it's done in a rush and with much bias. I don't see that it adds anything other than technical details that are not needed for the article but instead clutter it up.

If anyone wants this infromation back, feel free to add it again... but this time, don't make it POV, envangelistic and/or in duplication of what is already here. Also don't bury the reader in technical details.

--J-Star 16:35, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

BartPE vs. WinPE

"BartPE has a graphical user interface. WinPE has a command line interface." Since when does WinPE have a command-line interface? It quite definitely has a GUI. I'm changing this. --rdude 07:31, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In response to BartPE's having a graphical user interface, BartPE's shell program is Nu2Menu, which serves the role of the Start Menu on a standard version of Windows. WinPE does indeed boot into a GUI mode, but the shell is CMD.EXE, the Windows command line interpreter. WinPE is mainly operated from command line, though it may be necessary to run GUI programs like Notepad, thus, its main interface is a command line. Rmsuperstar99 17:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WinPE is only available to Microsoft OEM Partners

WinPE 2.0 (Vista PE) is available to any and all customers by downloading the Windows AIK and Business Deployment Workbench. I am going to fix this. Rmsuperstar99 17:55, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Live USB ?

The BartPE FAQ says that

booting from UFD is not always stable at the moment. ... Tricky stuff, maybe better support in future...

So mentioning the USB boot feature the same way as the CD boot is very misleading. --Xerces8 (talk) 12:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is this article supposed to be about?

Is it supposed to be about the differences between WinPE and BartPE or about BartPE? I came here looking for information about BartPE... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.179.226.195 (talk) 19:22, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BartPE vs. Windows Preinstallation Environment

I am questioning the neutrality of this section. I think it's mostly biased toward BartPE.Jasper Deng (talk) 21:44, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed it to a table.--Hum richard (talk) 23:52, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

removed bartpe vs winpe

This section was inaccurate and filled with useless crap. Samuel Bailey 02:25, 21 June 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Confuciou (talk • contribs)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on BartPE. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:19, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]