Jump to content

Talk:Barry Fuller

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Barry Fuller/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 20:06, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

  • Where's his birth date referenced?
  • Could crop the image for the infobox.
  • "2006-07 FA Trophy" make sure you use en-dashes where relevant per WP:DASH.
  • Anything about his personal life before signing up for the Addicks?
  • Underhill is a dab link.
  • Try to avoid repeating "Fuller" in consecutive sentences when there's no need to do so. If it's clear who "he" would be, then let it be "he" to avoid the repetition.
  • "on to make 9 more" -> nine.
  • "Despite these significant set-backs" I think "significant" is your opinion.
  • "by beating the Dale" that's not brilliant for folks who don't know Rochdale can be referred to as such.
  • "achieved his greatest professional honour to date" WP:OR and WP:POV.
  • "The 27-year-old defender..." last person mentioned was Frampton.
  • "making just 9 league appearances in total." -> "making just nine league appearances."
  • "having made 137 league appearances in total." no need for "in total".
  • " the 28-year-old defender " -> maybe "28-year-old Fuller..."?
  • Consistent retrieval date formats needed.
  • Ref titles, 3, 5, 7 etc... spaced hyphens rather than unspaced en-dashes.
  • soccerbase.com or Soccerbase?

The Rambling Man (talk) 20:17, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GAN criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Several issues raised above.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Some hints of OR.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

On hold pending the comments I've made above. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:17, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Barry Fuller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barry_Fuller&oldid=1207326768"