Talk:Baron Haden-Guest

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as Low-importance).

English Royalty

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Royalty. For more information, visit the project page.English RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject English RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject English RoyaltyEnglish royalty articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I assume the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Barons were brothers. Is it normal for a title to pass to siblings in this way? Bastie 03:34, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is if none of them have kids. What I want to know is, how did they come upon the awful name "Haden Haden-Guest"? --Jfruh 14:19, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

inbreeding?--Mongreilf 11:31, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Since Nicholas Haden-Guest (aka Nicholas Guest), the heir-presumptive to the Haden-Guest barony is American by birth and citizenship, does he still carry 'The Honorable? I think perhaps not.

Christopher Guest isn't a Baron

Surely Christopher Guest is not a Baron, his ancestor Christopher William Graham Guest, with who the title originated, was only a Life peer, and NOT a hereditary peer. As life peerages can't be inherited the title became extinct on 25 September 1984, when Christopher William Graham Guest died. Alanleonard (talk) 22:39, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Reply copied from Jamie Lee Curtis) :I am afraid you have your Baron Guests confused. Christopher Guest is the 5th Baron Haden-Guest of Saling, a heriditory peer and is not related to life peer and judge Baron Guest. Christopher's baronetcy originated with Leslie Haden-Guest, 1st Baron Haden-Guest and the current incumbant actually took his seat in the House of Lords for a short period of time until the major rehaul of the House. A photograph of him and Baroness Guest (Jamie Lee Curtis) in their ermine robes at his maiden appearance was published in the British broadsheets at the time. 21st CENTURY GREENSTUFF 00:12, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

'Created' in 1950?

The male line family tree shows the first Baron as having been born in 1877 yet the article claims the title was 'created' in 1950. There are many other problems stemming from this. Pootle (talk) 16:55, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It just means that the first baron was 73 when he was created a peer. What seems to be the problem?

HandsomeFella (talk) 20:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's how the British say it: titles are "created." The people they're created for were themselves generally created (i.e. born) some years before. They might also say so-and-so was "created Baron Haden-Guest" in 1950, though I don't know if that's a current usage having only seen it in old books. Furrycat66 (talk) 20:35, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]