This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Circus. If you would like to participate please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.CircusWikipedia:WikiProject CircusTemplate:WikiProject CircusCircus articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
A box was put on top of this article that it was lacking in references and sources. This is not true. There is a references section that lists the three websites from which the material for this article was drawn. Please see those websites for the content if you wish to verify this. Thank you. --Darmon02:51, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Darmon, I appreciate that you have put general references in the Barnum Museum section that you have titled References however this alone will not make it a good article as it does not provide the reader with information as to which parts of the article refer directly to the web-links that you have put up as a general guide. I appreciate that you are new to Wiki (as you say in your first edit summary (New article - hope I'm doing this right) but could you please look at WP:FOOT and WP:REF and then make some adjustments to the article before you remove the tag which does not say that there are no references but actually says that the article does not adequately cite its references and sources. Please note I am not trying to be difficult or grumpy - I am just interested in helping you understand what the consensus of established editors conventionally use throughout wikipedia.--VStalk07:49, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]