Talk:Barngarla language

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: South Australia / Indigenous peoples Low‑importance

	Australia portal Barngarla language is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Silliness

Silliness is insisting that "language" isn't part of the topic's name but must be part of the article's title -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:40, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You've been here long enough to know that WP:POINTY edits are inappropriate, and only reduce your credibility. — kwami (talk) 19:13, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LOLOL you were the one who put "silliness" as an edit comment; your credibility is the one on the ropes, boyo, and rightly so.Skookum1 (talk) 19:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The edit wasn't pointy. I was trying to find an arrangement that would work with both your preferences and the guidelines. -- JHunterJ (talk) 16:45, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary was: apparently "language" is part of the name of the language. It's hard to take a sarcastic comment such as that as anything other than pointy.

Your recent move BTW was good. I was blocked from moving it, and didn't think it worth making a request for a minor spelling variant. — kwami (talk) 21:36, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Makes ya think there should be a guideline about WP:SILLINESS huh? The same matter applies in the meanings of people-names (as was affirmed in the endonym RMs of last year and this re St'at'imc and Secwepemc, etc); this was all taken into account in the "old consensus", which is actually the "new" consensus, the former having been ignored, the latter stonewalled and denied and confounded endlessly. By silliness. And isn't that edit comment, one like so many, an NPA?Skookum1 (talk) 12:47, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]