Jump to content

Talk:Barnevelder

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chickenbreed Infobox

[edit]

A new infobox {{Infobox Chickenbreed}} has been created for chicken articles. If you see anywhere it needs improved please contact User:Stepshep. If it meets your criteria it is requested you add it to this article's page for standardization. Thanks! §hep • ¡Talk to me! 17:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

[edit]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 06:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Barnevelder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:05, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Barnevelder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting and Formatting

[edit]

Howdy,
I plan to start editing this page. My list of major anticipated edits is as follows:

  • Add citations to Chicken Breeds Infobox
  • Add citations to Introduction and Characteristics section
  • Reformat varieties section as a table
  • Edit Characteristics and Double-laced pattern sections for style

I will be keeping an ongoing list of minor edits and potential major edits on my personal Talk page. Once the list is more fleshed out, I will publish it here. McCoppin (talk) 06:04, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it could certainly do with some work, McCoppin! But why don't you just go ahead and edit the article? Do you read Dutch? – that would certainly be a help here, but this, which is the most useful source I found in a brief search, is also available in English. In my opinion, the Varieties section is too large, too detailed, and especially too poorly referenced – rather than a table, it could perhaps become a paragraph of running text? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:18, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the links, Justlettersandnumbers! Unfortunately, I don't read Dutch. Because of this, I doubt I will be able to add all of the necessary citations, but I will try to add as many as I can. I think you're right about the Varieties section as well; I'll see what I can take out or condense. McCoppin (talk) 15:18, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Justlettersandnumbers I made some major edits to the Varieties section, so I figured I should post it here before putting it into the article. I've trimmed it down to a paragraph of running text and deleted quite a bit of information. If the following edits are acceptable, I will go ahead and put them into the article:
"The original and most well-known Barnevelder variety is the double-laced variety, which has a single vertical comb and yellow legs, but other varieties also exist. There are large fowl as well as bantam versions of most of the different varieties. The double-laced, black, white, autosexing barred, dark brown, chamois, double-laced blue, and silver-black double-laced varieties have large fowl and bantam versions. The partridge, blue, and silver varieties have only large fowl versions. Not all countries recognize all these varieties in their Poultry Standards.[6][7][8][9]"
It looks like an improvement, McCoppin. The colours recognised in the various European countries are listed in this source:
It looks as if you may still have too many listed. I think the double-laced silver may not yet be recognised, but I haven't looked in detail. Have to go now … Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and thank you for checking here before making your changes, but you know you really don't need to! I 'm not sure if anyone else is watching this page, but if by any chance I don't exactly agree with something you do, I'll almost certainly say so! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References?

[edit]

A suggestion to make editing this page a little easier: what if we change the referencing system over to list-defined? That would take the references out of the body text and group them in the References section; they'd all need a ref name such as <ref name=ee>; all that would then appear in the body text would be either <ref name=ee /> or – still more economical – {{r|ee}}. That would make the text a lot easier to read, specially where there are a large number of references. I won't make this change without agreement here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like a good idea to me, Justlettersandnumbers. I don't know much about that style of references, but it would make editing easier. McCoppin (talk) 06:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I went ahead and did that, hope it helps. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:43, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barnevelder&oldid=1256847806"