Jump to content

Talk:Barkha Dutt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Date of birth

[edit]

Her date of birth is Dec 18, 1971. Can someone please add that information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.159.31 (talk) 09:44, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide a reference? Then we could add it. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It is indeed. I have added it. Yash! 12:02, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Barkha Dutt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Barkha Dutt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Barkha's complaint about the Wikipedia

[edit]
There's Talk:Barkha Dutt/Archive 1#Barkha_Dutt_is_unmarried which refers to the Jaipur fest and to my knowledge, there continue to be repeated additions of one person as a spouse. Since long that all has been cleaned up and page temporarily protected. The article still has quite dubious content for criticism which I'm going to sniff through again but it was worse before. She might be exaggerating regarding the "three" part. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 09:24, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blogger mention

[edit]

I'm removing this. The original discussion #Use of CIOL as source here shows clear consensus to remove. The more recent #Chaitanya Kunte mention where one editor added back, it's almost the same with blogs currently for sources, and two below average refs. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 09:37, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism content

[edit]

Britta Ohm wrote in 2011 that Dutt has attracted "substantial criticism" over the past few years for her various aspects of her reporting.[1] Writing for the New York Times, Lydia Polgreen wrote that critics viewed Dutt and some other reporters as extremely "theatrical and melodramatic" in their coverage of the 2008 attacks.[2] Varadarajan wrote that it was improper on part of Barkha Dutt to recognise a politically mobilised mob as "Hindus".[3]

Moving this here from article for further inspection. Putting multiple quotes from these people at her bio page seems WP:UNDUE. I'm getting the feeling that the Mumbai attacks maybe more relevant to the individual article since they seem to criticise journalists' coverage of it in general rather than just her. I'll verify the sources to see what they say and see what is to be done. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't access Cole's book on my Google Book accounts but otherwise my suspicions were right. Polgreen's article give a well-balanced view on her and the Radia Tapes involvement while Ohm does so too regarding the 2002 Gujarat violence, these two quotes were cherry picked and gives the wrong idea, misrepresenting the sources. One can't help but think how badly the person who put this wanted to added just these two parts, that they didn't bother (intentionally?) to refer to the refs actually meant.
Ohm actually interestingly, calls Dutt a Hindutva supporter, which is really quite contradictory to what her detractors accuse her of. Ohm goes on to tell how Dutt covered the violence, which is really relevant and must be added here on further research.
Polgreen covers her early career success and goes on to say how she became the face of the Radia tapes despite featuring only in little of the tapes. Polgreen is generally supportive of her.
Both these sources can be used to improve the article, right now I've trimmed the criticism content to WP:DUE relevance (again). Expanding with them should help the gap that there's not much content telling how she is successful as a journalist. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 11:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Ohm, Britta (2011). Banaji, Shakuntala (ed.). South Asian Media Cultures: Audiences, Representations, Contexts. London, UK: Anthem Press. ISBN 9781843313205. Retrieved 15 July 2013.
  2. ^ Polgreen, Lydia (3 December 2010). "A Journalist in India Ends Up in the Headlines". New York Times. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
  3. ^ Sonwalkar, Prasun (2006). Cole, Benjamin (ed.). Conflict, Terrorism And the Media in Asia. Routledge. p. 89. ISBN 9780415351980. Retrieved 12 July 2013.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Barkha Dutt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RfC about lead

[edit]

Should the following line from the lead be deleted?

Dutt was one of the journalists taped in the Radia tapes controversy.

Dutt's primary identity is a journalist and there is already a section about Radia tapes in the article. ChunnuBhai (talk) 07:06, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]