Talk:Bare-tailed woolly opossum/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 17:02, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Funny, I added a Flickr photo to this article years ago, that's how I noticed you had nominated it... Seems you're going into new directions with the latest nominations? FunkMonk (talk) 17:02, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- That dumb Legobot takes ages to let me know who takes up reviews! Funny I came to know you had grabbed this when I saw your contribs. Smaller mammals seems to be a pitiably neglected field, and the countless stubs can be easily improved. So I try to create GAs from this field as well, a bit change as well.Sainsf (talk · contribs) 17:17, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Perhaps add this illustration?[1] The photos are a bit obscured...
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Caluromys_philander_Schreber.jpg){kind=link}
- OK, let's add this as a new image. I couldn't find this just then... Sainsf (talk · contribs) 17:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- "In another similar revision, the bushy-tailed opossum was placed in its own subfamily, Glironiinae" You mention the year of other revisions, why not this one?
- Done.
- What is the difference between the subspecies? I see there is some clinal differences mentioned.
- I'm afraid not, very little info on these opossums (yet this is one of the best known of them!)
- Does it have a Prehensile tail? If so, link?
- Yeah, missed it.
- Perhaps give a brief overview of the evolution of opposums? The fact that it is a marsupial could be stressed.
- I have not researched on that yet, opossums are a quite large order. I will spam bits on species articles when I finally work on the Opossum article, it would be easier to understand once I understand the species. Said "in the marsupial order Didelphimorphia".
- No more to add!
- This must be the shortest review I have had from you! Sainsf (talk · contribs) 08:50, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- It's a pretty short article as well... I guess it is easy to be comprehensive, when little has been written about the subject! Anyway, I'll now pass it. FunkMonk (talk) 11:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)