Talk:Banksia violacea/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hey there, nice article. I'll be reviewing it. Some remarks...
- This was an invalid publication, however, and a nomen nudum to boot. - "To boot" seems very informal.
- (agreed. nothing is lost by its removal, hence removed.) Casliber (talk · contribs) 19:35, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- However, Thiele's B. subser. - I can't understand this at all to be honest.
- (okay, I unabbreviated the terms and put in a little explanation - is that better?) Casliber (talk · contribs) 19:43, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Otherwise, it's excellent. Putting this on-hold, but the above issues should be fixable within a minute or two. Good work! –Juliancolton | Talk 15:04, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- Passing, nicely done. –Juliancolton | Talk 04:08, 30 January 2010 (UTC)