Talk:Banksia acanthopoda/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Review and comments forthcoming...
Reviewer: – VisionHolder « talk » 15:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Pass: I made a few small changes, most notably by using the Convert template. (I did notice an error in the handling of sigfigs when dealing with temps, but I have reported it to the template's talk page, and it should be fixed soon.) I used the template to ensure MoS was followed in regards to non-breaking spaces, which were not consistent on the page prior to the edit. All-in-all, it is well-written, thorough (given our current understanding of the plant), and appears to meet all MoS requirements.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Good job! – VisionHolder « talk » 16:50, 12 February 2010 (UTC)