Talk:Bank of Nolensville

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal Bank of Nolensville is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

development

This article was just now started in a semi-automated way, and could use more attention, perhaps including use of sources that might be found online. Please help! :) Try Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Or vary that search. Try, for National Park Service material: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Or develop from the sources already included in the article! Thanks. :) --do ncr am 18:28, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An editor removed sourced statements from article with edit summary mentioning "No article", which I don't understand. I restored the statements. Please do explain if you have a point. --do ncr am 13:18, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant there was that Jenkins had no article of his own, and since it merely stated that he was a "promoter" and president of the bank, I didn't think it was noteworthy enough to mention.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:46, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's relevant, and the link in particular provides context for more development of the topic. Thanks for fixing the google book display link.

I also restored 2 other sourced statements, now twice deleted by SarekOfVulcan: 1) The listing was for an area of less than one acre with just the one building.(with NRIS ref) and 2) The property is denoted as WM-1117 by the state historical association.(also with NRIS ref that supports the usage of WM-1117 as a code for the site). I believe those are factual and add. SarekOfVulcan, do you believe there is some general agreement such statements should not be included in articles? I don't agree there is a consensus anywhere for that, and in fact there are editors who've argued that informational type info like that which appears in infoboxes (some but not all of this actually is infobox) must be repeated in text. Removing from text, if not in infobox, is worse. In the interim, such statements should be kept in. If there is some RFC reaching some consensus, this and other articles can be revisited, but tearing out the info seems bad. --do ncr am 14:12, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if there was any single location where I gathered this consensus, so I've started a discussion at WT:NRHP to see if we can establish the answer one way or the other. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:37, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

development

Further reading