Talk:Banjarmasin/GA2

GA Review

Unsuccessful. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 00:11, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Fehufanga (talk · contribs) 23:15, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will be starting a review later today or tomorrow. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 23:15, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Fehufanga I apologize for the suddenness but please fail this nomination as I am afraid just like Palu, I wont be able to finish most of the concerns Nyanardsan (talk) 00:03, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Closing as withdrawn. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 00:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.