Talk:Bangerz/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mr. Gonna Change My Name Forever (talk · contribs) 00:19, 2 April 2014 (UTC) Hi, I'm Gonna. I forgot to create this page as I read this Bangerz article, but I did so after reading it. This is my sixth GAN review.[reply]

Here are the issues I find in this article:

No references in the lead (if any).
The entirety of this article (especially tone, grammar, and prose) needs a copyedit from the Guild of Copy Editors (GoCE).
It reads like a biased news article.
Please don't rely heavily on primary sources.
"Legacy" is unnecessary.
I see incomplete references.
Sometimes the article has incorrect formatting.

The result is just a quickfail. ~~Mr*|(60nna)~~ 00:19, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Being on a non-biased observer of this article, it seems like this may need a second opinion, for numerous reasons:

A) A lead is NEVER to have references in it, which should come as basic knowledge to every Wikipedia editor
B) The article is well written, only simple errors that can be addressed in the GA review itself.
C) The "Legacy" is non-existent, unless you are referring to the "Impact" section, in which is well sourced and justifiable.

A quick fail on this seems unreasonable, so I would suggest re nominating this for a second opinion. Giacobbe ^talk 00:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]