Talk:Bandy field
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
I think this article is good but...
[edit]There appears to be a lot of original research and un-sourced information. 2 sources is not enough to cover the large amount of information in this article. There are various claims such as "this can be hazardous to the players," that have no citations. Rather than litter the entire article with [citation needed] tags, I prefer to leave a tag. Additionally, the content is not formatted well as per WP:MOS. There is a single long 'main' section with an unrelated headline. I will try to help with the formatting at least (where I can). But this sport is not my area of expertise. I wont be able to add citations. Beakermeep(talk) 02:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- I should also note I think most of the info here is good and likely worth keeping, it just needs to be sourced. Beakermeep(talk) 02:28, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- It is sourced. The source for most of it is the Bandy Playing Rules, which are referred to in one footnote and then continuosly in the text. I didn't think there was any reason to clutter the text with footnotes to the same source. Bandy boy (talk) 02:33, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- I added a two more sources to help some but I think a few more would always help. Either way I think maybe you are right and that most of the information is not controversial too. I'm hoping some more editors will pitch in though. This has potential to be a very good article, so I suggest leaving the tags up to try and solicit help. What do you think? Beakermeep(talk) 02:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- It is sourced. The source for most of it is the Bandy Playing Rules, which are referred to in one footnote and then continuosly in the text. I didn't think there was any reason to clutter the text with footnotes to the same source. Bandy boy (talk) 02:33, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Bandy field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140325044742/http://www8.idrottonline.se/DjurgardensIFBandyforening-Bandy/Sponsorer/ to http://www8.idrottonline.se/DjurgardensIFBandyforening-Bandy/Sponsorer/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130511181936/http://www.worldbandy.com/ckfinder/userfiles/files/Rules/Bandyrules_FIB_Sept2011.pdf to http://www.worldbandy.com/ckfinder/userfiles/files/Rules/Bandyrules_FIB_Sept2011.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140118050153/http://iof1.idrottonline.se/SvenskaBandyforbundet/Bandynyheter/Classeshistoriskahorna/Aldrekronikor/Sargensentreforandradebandyn/ to http://iof1.idrottonline.se/SvenskaBandyforbundet/Bandynyheter/Classeshistoriskahorna/Aldrekronikor/Sargensentreforandradebandyn/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)