Jump to content

Talk:Banded bullfrog/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 21:33, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hello! I'll be taking a look at this article for the January 2022 GAN backlog drive. If you haven't already signed up, please feel free to join in! Although QPQ is not required, if you're feeling generous, I also have a list of GA nominations of my own right here.

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

[edit]
  • No comma needed after "dark brown back" Green tickY
  • "low altitudes" Green tickY
  • Where is it a potential invasive species? Green tickY

Taxonomy and etymology

[edit]
  • Good

Description

[edit]
  • Why are the gram weights not converted into imperial units, but all the length measurements are? Green tickY

Distribution and habitat

[edit]
  • Good

As an invasive species

[edit]
  • Both the invasive population is under control and no established invasive population has been found need "as of" qualifiers, as those statements are liable to change. Green tickY
     Working on this one a bit more – a helpful IP editor has actioned the other suggestions so far. Thanks for the initial comments! DanCherek (talk) 23:30, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Alright, added another source for the Florida part, and "as of" has been added! DanCherek (talk) 00:36, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Behaviour and ecology

[edit]

Diet, predators, and parasites

[edit]

Pet trade

[edit]

Status and threats

[edit]

References

[edit]
  • Looks good

General comments

[edit]
  • Images are properly licensed and obviously relevant
  • No stability concerns in revision history
  • Earwig score looks good

Thank you for your patience; I have been working through several health issues both physical and mental. Putting on hold now. — GhostRiver 17:44, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks GhostRiver, and no problem at all. I hope you feel better on all fronts soon. Responded to each point above, let me know if you see any other issues! DanCherek (talk) 18:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for making those changes, happy to pass! — GhostRiver 16:36, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]