Talk:Bambi Meets Godzilla

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tokusatsu, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tokusatsu on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TokusatsuWikipedia:WikiProject TokusatsuTemplate:WikiProject TokusatsuTokusatsu articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Animation: Canadian / Films Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Canadian animation work group.
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Canadian / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

A Day in the Life

The chord is played at double speed, not half-speed. Which is easy enough to verify by comparing the film with The Beatles' song on youtube. You can even double the speed to test it out. --Rex Diablo (talk) 18:30, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lose the VHS cover

It's in color, unlike the cartoon, is a spoiler, and really has nothing to do with the topic. Looks more like an advertisement, actually. I'm not editing anymore, just suggesting.

Spoiler?

[[Image:Filmnacht5.jpg|thumb|This unavoidable picture is the biggest spoiler!--[[User:Greasysteve13|Greasysteve13]] 14:47, 25 September 2006 (UTC)]]

Shouldn't this article have a spoiler warning? It gives away the entire plot in the second paragraph! :-) Stephen Kosciesza 140.147.160.78 15:25, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Read the article history. Wahkeenah 19:53, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me that there was no discussion, just a minor edit war on 19-Apr-2006, and the spoiler warning ended up out. My opinion, FWIW, is that the spoiler warning should stay in. It does no harm. Wikipedia shouldn't judge what is or isn't an "important" spoiler. A spoiler is a spoiler. Rocksong 07:11, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Since posting that comment on the 4th I've observed that 70-year-old movies have spoiler warnings, on the off-chance no one has seen it, so there's no reason this one shouldn't have it. Wahkeenah 07:17, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

If you have already seen the cartoon, yes, the cover defines the cartoon. But if you have not seen or heard of it, then you might at least wonder if Bambi has a surprise for Godzilla, like maybe quickly stepping aside revealing a red-hot metal spike right where Godzilla stomps. Notice, though, that it probably took longer to type this comment than the running time of the cartoon. :) Wahkeenah 15:08, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sequel?

I recall seeing another short that begins where this one leaves off. Bambi sticks explosives into big G's toes and blows his foot off.

Tv land

I'm watching a tvland special Tv myths and ledgends about hollywood myths and they're talking about Disney. They start to get funny by having an animated sketch of bambi running and a godzilla picture apears and is chashing him.

Clean up

I have just added a sequel section with an infobox and plot for Son of Bambi meets Godzilla. I have also put any pieces of writing that can be considered trivia in a new trivia section and renamed the Pop Culture section References in Popular Culture. --82.39.136.208 20:00, 9 February 2007 (UTC)Indie.Bones[reply]

Trivia

I have redistributed the material formerly contained in the "Trivia" section. I believe it is all relevant to the article, and should not be listed as Trivia. See Wikipedia Guideline. --RichardVeryard 01:19, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy

In my opinion despite being one of the greatest cartoons Bambi meets Godzilla was banned by the Walt Disney Company and the BBC. This was due to copyright issues. Can anyone confirm this please. Rolotomrolo (talk) 21:41, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of citation Espngeek (talk) 23:07, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Error removed

The article mentioned that Caselotti received a screen credit in this film. I've seen the film a million times and don't recall ever seeing such a credit. I just viewed it again and the only non-Newland credits are for Mr and Mrs Newland and the City of Tokyo, so I removed the erroneous information. On an unrelated matter, I recall this cartoon was broadcast on a Canadian children's show in the 1970s - possibly CTV's Kidstuff but I can't recall well enough to add the information here; maybe someone else can remember this. 70.72.211.35 (talk) 14:59, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Importance

Article doesn't explain why this was such an important animation. I watched the restoration on Youtube and it's mildly funny but a one-note joke - why is it famous? --Gwern (contribs) 16:33 17 February 2013 (GMT)

Having just watched it, I'd have to say the same. It's hard to see why it was apparently considered one of the greatest pieces of animation - it barely contains any animation! Robofish (talk) 23:41, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Throughout the 1990s, it was used quite a bit as a metaphor to describe the common relationship between Silicon Valley start-ups and Microsoft/Bill Gates, and it still gets used[1]. It was used famously by Marc Andreessen and Scott Cook of Netscape and Intuit respectively to describe Microsoft in their internal memos and interviews. Andreessen switches between Bambi Meets Godzilla and The Godfather, and other CEOs are known for using Moby Dick and Star Wars. Bambi Meets Godzilla was the more popular metaphor because of its short, abrupt ending. In 1998 when United States v. Microsoft Corp. was initiated, Larry Ellison took all 7,300 employees in Oracle's HQ to go see Godzilla in theaters. I'm not familiar with how important it was during the 1970s and 1980s. Tuxide (talk) 07:33, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another reference for your list [2]

On June 18, 2003, U.S. District Judge Barbara Rothstein ordered that four million dollars of the criminal fines imposed as a result of the Bellingham tragedy be awarded as an endowment to fund the Pipeline Safety Trust. Judge Rothstein noted that the Trust, with only 4 million dollars, was like “Bambi taking on Godzilla,” but she chided the pipeline industry to listen to and work with the Pipeline Safety Trust so tragedies like Bellingham do not happen again.

DeadElvis (talk) 02:52, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bambi Meets Godzilla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303190028/http://alanbates.com/abarchive/film/king.html to http://alanbates.com/abarchive/film/king.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:50, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Restored and released"

I believe the following text was wildly inaccurate and had nothing to do with the "Screenings and distribution" section it is in: "The film was restored and released in 1080p on YouTube by an animator named Coda Gardner." First, it's a terrible sentence. Second, Gardner's video isn't a restoration, it's effectively a frame by frame copy of the animation, so the description is false. Further, it's not a perfect recreation because the credit scrolling doesn't precisely match the original, As such, I believe this should be classified as a "remake" rather than as "restoration", and likely doesn't belong in the "Screenings and distribution" section.

I checked the linked REFs and the animator herself refers to it as a "re-creation" and " I decided to try my hand at re-doing this classic animation via computer.", ergo. I am correcting the article to be in line with these sources. MrNeutronSF (talk) 05:57, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Biggest Troll in Animation

'nuff said. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:444:380:3A90:5D29:1EE6:E042:C0B3 (talk) 17:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Reference

Can anyone fix my reference to Bambi's Revenge (1978) so people can look it up? Thanks!Malcolmlucascollins (talk) 22:58, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm serious. I could really use some help here.Malcolmlucascollins (talk) 04:00, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]