Talk:Balnibarbi (trilobite)

Arthropods Low‑importance

	Arthropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Page move

I've moved this from "Balnibarbi" to "Balnibarbi (trilobite)"; the creature described is named after the fictional island by that name, so that should be the primary topic. I've used the same disambiguation format as others in the article's category. I trust that is OK with everyone. Moonraker12 (talk) 17:41, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 30 September 2014

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

{{requested move/dated|Balnibarbi (genus)}}

Balnibarbi (trilobite) → Balnibarbi (genus) – It is unnecessary to be so specific if there are no other taxa sharing the same name. Mr Fink (talk) 16:27, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Weak oppose I find I like the current disambiguation, it is no more extra precise than using "horse" instead of "animal" for individual horses (or dogs, or cats). -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 04:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (obviously!); the current title was chosen for consistency with other pages in the linked category. Moonraker12 (talk) 14:13, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

rescinding move request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apokryltaros (talk • contribs) 18:59, 1 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Balnibarbi (trilobite). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060905162524/http://strata.ummp.lsa.umich.edu/jack/showgenera.php?taxon=307&rank=class to http://strata.ummp.lsa.umich.edu/jack/showgenera.php?taxon=307&rank=class

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]