Talk:Balderton

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Balderton article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Nottinghamshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nottinghamshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NottinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject NottinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject NottinghamshireNottinghamshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History

I have added brief details of two C14 petitions. Crococolana 15:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some more information about Balderton from history and have started a bibliography.Crococolana 14:00, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Schools

I have added more details about education in Balderton. Crococolana 15:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

== Balderton New Hall ==

I have added a section on the new hall/mental hospital.Crococolana 22:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Administration

I have added a reference to the parish council and its website.Crococolana 21:49, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the pronunciation bollerton. This was how the name was said when I was a boy there and I still hear it in my family who live there. I have never heard the pronunciation bulderton but presumably this is a new development. The alternative for the first vowel rhymed with doll. A pronunciation rhyming it with or (borlderton) was heard little and was not local.Crococolana (talk) 23:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, unless you can source this verifiably beyond your own family, it fails WP:OR. Frickative (talk) 21:57, 3 February 2008 (UTC

See here where the use of bollerton is confirmed on a Lincolnshire genealogy site, 3 April 2004, in a discussion about Ramper http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/read/ENG-LINCSGEN/2004-04/1081022374 Crococolana (talk) 13:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest reading WP:VER, which this source still doesn't meet by a long shot unfortunately. Forum posts, posts on blogs, that sort of thing, just aren't classed as verifiable sources by Wikipedia. Frickative (talk) 17:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the wikipedia articles for Launceston, Cornwall; Ilkeston, Derbyshire; and Meopham, Kent. I have chosen them at random and all give pronunciations unattested in approved print. Consistency is required. Are all approved-print-unattested pronunciations to be removed from wikipedia? Crococolana (talk) 15:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is no argument for inclusion. It might be different were 'Bollerton' actually how the village name was pronounced, but I seem to recall mentioning in an edit summary that having lived there for 20 years, not a single person had ever pronounced it that way. Frickative ^(talk) 16:13, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The pronunciation of many places is not recorded in printed books and thus wikipedia by that standard must exclude much that is known. A printed book is not likely to be more accurate than the views of people on the ground. It is odd that a cyber encyclopedia should disvalue cyber knowledge over printed knowledge.

I lived in Balderton in the 40s and 50s, many of my family still do. bollerton is a pronunciation I am familiar with and heard and hear. You say "were 'bollerton' actually how the village name was pronounced": well, it was and is by some villagers, me included.Crococolana (talk) 22:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I certainly didn't make the rules, I've just tried and tried again to explain them. Drop a message over at the talkpage of WP:OR and see what they have to say, because I can almost guarantee that it won't be in favour of inclusion. Frickative 14:16, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Subdivision

This whole article needs rewriting to take into account the creation of the new parish of Fernwood, effectively lopping the whole Balderton South Ward off the parishSkinsmoke (talk) 22:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Balderton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927010852/http://www.crsbi.ac.uk/ed/nt/balde/index.htm to http://www.crsbi.ac.uk/ed/nt/balde/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]