Talk:Balance of angular momentum
Appearance
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
{{help me}} Hello, this article exists since ten days and nothing happens, no {{AfC submission}}. On creation I followed the guideline. Is it in the wrong category or is there any other error? How can I promote the {{AfC submission}}? --Alva2004 (talk) 04:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- You can submit this article for review by adding
{{subst:submit}}
to the top of the page. You may also be able to move the page into article space yourself. Thank you for your contribution, and please let me know if you have any other questions. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 04:40, 22 April 2022 (UTC)- Alva2004: I was looking into the idea of submitting this article for review on your behalf, but I got stuck on a few things. As best I can tell, the topic of this article is most commonly called, in English, Conservation of angular momentum, a term that currently redirects to Angular Momentum. On that page, there is already considerable coverage of this topic. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 04:52, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- jmcgnh: I saw this also. But: Angular Momentum mostly treats of the equations, and there mostly the conservation laws. This article is almost free of formulas (except in the section area rule), shorter, imho less technical than Angular Momentum and treats more of historical development and significance for continuum mechanics. --Alva2004 (talk) 05:11, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Alva2004: I was looking into the idea of submitting this article for review on your behalf, but I got stuck on a few things. As best I can tell, the topic of this article is most commonly called, in English, Conservation of angular momentum, a term that currently redirects to Angular Momentum. On that page, there is already considerable coverage of this topic. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 04:52, 22 April 2022 (UTC)