Talk:Bakers Delight

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bakers Delight article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Food and drink

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Australia Low‑importance

Bakers Delight is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article is not assigned to a WikiProject or workgroup. Please help with your suggestions.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

dispute discussion

anon-177.120.18.131 appears to dislike this version. Which part is the problem? The text about 2007 is well sourced, but they are old issue and may be in need of an update, or be removed. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 06:36, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored most of this material; please discuss rather than overwrite the page with a bad page. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 22:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

COBS Bread

Why is the information about COBS Bread being removed all the time!? John Vandenberg ^(chat) 02:22, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The information about COBS Bread being in the United States is removed because there are no COBS Bread stores in the United States. While there were a few COBS bakeries in the US, they now operate purely in Canada. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alec19 (talk • contribs) 05:03, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Lets describe their stay in the US market, rather than remove all reference to it. How long were they in the US market? Why did they leave the US market? John Vandenberg ^(chat) 12:44, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dblies.com

bdlies.com is an advocacy website. It definitely does not belong as the first external link, and .. unless it has been mentioned in the press, I don't think it belongs on this article at all. The issues raised on that website may be worth integrating into the Wikipedia page, if they have been mentioned in the media. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 23:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear John,

I would appreciate the link (to BDLies) being allowed to remain on Wiki. The BDLies site provides important information about franchising; not just about Bakers Delight. It has become a site where people can look to see what is happening in Australian franchising - particularly in regards to reform.

Bakers Delight has tried to shut down a former franchisees site before. Please see: http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/word/2008/d2008-0006.doc

There are a number of former franchisees in dispute with Bakers Delight. Please see the following references regarding my own dispute.

I can provide a number of links regarding negative publicity regarding Bakers Delight to counter their 'positive' ones however I would prefer to just leave the link to the BDLies site and let people decide for themselves.

Regards,

Deanne de Leeuw —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deannedeleeuw (talk • contribs) 09:19, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We avoid links to blogs. See Wikipedia:External links#Links normally to be avoided No. 11. However, if BDLies has been mentioned a number of times in the media, it may be appropriate to mention it. i.e. you would need to find more sources like this, which mention the Bakers Delight Lies website.

If bdlies.com has useful information about Bakers Delight, we want to incorporate that information into the Wikipedia article about Bakers Delight.

If bdlies.com has useful information about Australian franchising, we can incorporate that information into the Wikipedia article about Franchising#Australia.

i.e. our objective is to build a self-contained knowledge base. We do not want to refer our readers to other websites, of unknown quality, in order to learn more.

John Vandenberg ^(chat) 03:00, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As per discussion above, the link to bdlies has again been removed from the Bakers Delight page. Blogs tend to contain opinion, rather than fact, which while it can be valid, does not have a place in an encyclopaedia - which is, at heart, what Wikipedia is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alec19 (talk • contribs) 03:38, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Herald Sun source disappeared

The source "Bakers Delight to apologise on sick-leave sackings | Herald Sun" still appears in Google, but has disappeared off the website.

Google provides the following snippet:

“

BAKERS Delight management will tell staff at a Sydney franchise that a workplace agreement stating they will be sacked if they call in sick is "completely ...

”

John Vandenberg ^(chat) 02:02, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That text was in the article off and on from 19 July 2007 through 12 January 2010 per this search result. — Jeff G. ツ 05:36, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware of that; my comment above is due to the text being removed from our article. When I tried to verify it, I was a bit surprised that it has been removed from the source. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 07:43, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eytmology of "cobs"

The etymology of the Canadian version needs to be included.Curb Chain (talk) 06:15, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bakers Delight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090807122434/http://www.marketingmag.com.au:80/careers/view/moments-with-marketers-chris-caldwell-1446 to http://www.marketingmag.com.au/careers/view/moments-with-marketers-chris-caldwell-1446

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:51, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]