Talk:Bakarwal

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bakarwal article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ethnic groups

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

India: Jammu and Kashmir Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bakarwal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130207163453/http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Tables_Published/SCST/scst_main.html to http://censusindia.gov.in/Tables_Published/SCST/scst_main.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:39, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Society section copyright problem or plagiarism

The content of the "Society" section was added along with other content, on 25 October 2015 by IP editor 27.97.7.206 without any citations. The same text was published a year later in Suri, Kavita; Raina, Permilla (2016). "A study of educational status of tribal Bakkarwal children of Kalakote Block in Rajouri District of Jammu and Kashmir" (PDF). Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. 4 (11): 72–81. It is not clear if the IP editor copied from a prepublication copy of the Suri & Raina paper, or whether Suri & Raina copied from the Wikipedia without citation. Given that Suri has been publishing about the Bakarwal since at least 2013, it might seem unlikely that such an author would need to plagiarise the Wikipedia concerning such a description. It is also possible that Suri's description of Bakarwal society was drawn from an earlier paper of hers and was just reproduced in her October 2016 paper, thus providing the IP editor with the text a year earlier in October 2015. On this basis it might possibly be a copyright violation and I have marked it with the {{Copyright violation}} template. What gives me pause, however, is the appearence in the Suri & Raina paper of text from the Wikipedia that was not added by 27.97.7.206. Most notable, is that by April 2015 the Wikipedia article stated inter-marriages freely take place among them with a citation that confirms, however in May 2015 IP editor 123.239.164.149 changed that to inter-marriages dont take place among them with this edit, and then the Suri & Raina paper apes the incorrect information stating inter-marriages do not take place among them. The Wikipedia article was not corrected from 123.239.164.149's spurious edit until May 2017 with this edit by InformavoreSultan, at which time the text again conformed with the cited source. That suggests that the Suri & Raina paper copied the Wikipedia. --Bejnar (talk) 22:01, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

History section

I note the section above expressing concern about copyright issues. The history section of the article also has them, being a close paraphrase of the TRCF report cited. It isn't a great source anyway: it reports what one Bakarwal activist said, which is pretty much as opposed to WP:RS as can be got. At best, it should be replaced; at worst, it needs a re-write. - Sitush (talk) 15:58, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]