Talk:Baise
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Baise article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Why "Baise" (an not Bose)? - see Cihai - --Reiner Stoppok 04:19, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Bósè is the local name and also the older form which you will find in older dictionaries (Cihai); Bǎisè is the modern standard which you will find in newer dictionaries (Xiandai Hanyu cidian). --72.75.56.66 (talk) 23:20, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Old name 百色地区 ?
[edit]There's an article in cn.wiki zh:百色地区 seemingly refering to the older name of Baise I think... --katpatuka (talk) 18:17, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
This is confusing.
[edit]This is about a "prefecture-level city", which is a large subprovincial unit of Guangxi.
Without getting into pointless attempts to correlate chinese administrative terminology with English-language concepts ( which vary themselves between the various English-language countries ), there are a lot of questions which the reader may have, which are not really addressed by the current text at all.
Is there an actual large town or city ( in the plain English meaning of the word ), which is the "capital", in the general sense, of this sub-provincial reason ? Is it also called "Baise", or something else ? Is that what the "urban district" mentioned in the story is ? Do the locals, or indeed people in other places, actually call it that ? If so, how many people live there ? What town is the Baise Railway station located in ( or very near to ) ? Where are buses with the big sign on the front "Baise", actually going ?
This is a problem for many of the articles about Chinese cities, which are also the headquarters of large sub-provincial units which include large tracts of rural land and countless villages well beyond the urban area of the "city". It is also a problem in other countries - for example, contrast "the city of London", and "Greater London". However, those concepts are well explained in the relevant places - for these chinese "cities" which cover thousands of square kilometres of rural land and forests, they are not. Lathamibird (talk) 11:44, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Baise or BaiSe or Bai Se is pronounced sort of like "buy-zuh". The Baise railway station is in Baise. That sure would be weird if it weren't... It's in the northeast of the city. But there are other stations on that same line just several minutes away. The ticket to there is relatively expensive, around $75 one-way on the train, but it is an amazing ride there. And yes, locals tend to call anything on that side of the Vietnam border "Baise", even if it's well outside the city. Don't ever try saying "Bose", no one will ever know what you are talking about. Most of the people are Zhuang people, and Baise is really different than other cities in China. I'd say it is a very nice city with very nice people, with food (produce, mainly) that is of vastly higher quality and lower prices than one would find in first tier Chinese cities. Nanning is the big town people talk about in Baise.66.245.201.216 (talk) 13:30, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Baise. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707031838/http://cdc.cma.gov.cn/shuju/search1.jsp?dsid=SURF_CLI_CHN_MUL_MMON_19712000_CES&tpcat=SURF&type=table&pageid=3 to http://cdc.cma.gov.cn/shuju/search1.jsp?dsid=SURF_CLI_CHN_MUL_MMON_19712000_CES&tpcat=SURF&type=table&pageid=3
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129083137/http://www.tjcn.org/rkpcgb/rkpcgb/201112/22627.html to http://www.tjcn.org/rkpcgb/rkpcgb/201112/22627.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129083137/http://www.tjcn.org/rkpcgb/rkpcgb/201112/22627.html to http://www.tjcn.org/rkpcgb/rkpcgb/201112/22627.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:38, 13 July 2017 (UTC)