Jump to content

Talk:Baengnyeongdo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

"Baekryeong Island" sounds like "Bakery-On-Island" and "Baengnyeong Island" sounds like "Bang-knee-on-Island". --Shultz 06:50, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, actually the name sounds a lot more like "bang-nyung." -- Visviva 07:11, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

cleanup

[edit]

Shultz III has requested: [article expand and reqphoto templates]

I have moved these from the article page. — Lomn Talk 16:06, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The first two lines (in Korean) in References should be moved to the External links section. Shosai (talk) 08:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Importance

[edit]

This Island is important. It may become involved in a war between North and South Korea, (Or hopefully only in peace talks) these days it is in the news. Note that an objective look in the map shows that logically it should belong to North Korea. Here is an article on recent events in the news: North fires artillery near South territory. Now is a good time to consider adding information in here. Ron64 (talk) 15:45, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

National treasures

[edit]

In the Wik article on Korean Nat. Trea., there is no listing of the numbers given in the Baeklyeongdo article. Kdammers (talk) 01:03, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inhabited?

[edit]

Is the island inhabited? It would seem so, but this should be made explicit. Number of inhabitants and names of principal towns or villages would be nice too. Also info on the local economy. -- 85.179.127.236 (talk) 08:45, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Closed, article already boldly moved Mike Cline (talk) 18:03, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Baengnyeong Island → Baengnyeongdo – For consistency with other rivers(gang or cheon), mountains(san), islands(do) in geography of South Korea. Sawol (talk) 20:00, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. We have a set of naming conventions for Korean geographic entries WP:NC-KO. These conventions aren't set in stone, but they represent a consensus that has been established among multiple interested users, and it can't be changed piecemeal or by a single user. I suggest taking up a proposal at the talk page for the naming conventions subpage. It would be great if you could advertise the discussion to interested projects, etc. --Amble (talk) 20:19, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Extra comment: My oppose to this requested move is specifically in opposition to moves of individual articles against the current naming convention. If you start a discussion of a change to the naming convention, you might well convince me that your proposal is better. --Amble (talk) 01:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Korean)#Islands, the full unhyphenated Korean name including do should be used, as in Baengnyeongdo. User:Amble and User:SLawsonIII are wrong. Sawol (talk) 07:51, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
  • Note : I stand corrected regarding the previous guideline. I also note that Sawol honored my request to put together a proposal for guideline changes and that the guidelines have been modified accordingly. Thanks. --Amble (talk) 20:25, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Baengnyeongdo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:05, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Baengnyeongdo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baengnyeongdo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:35, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Baengnyeongdo&oldid=1221244660"